This is an excerpt from Chapter 2 of the essay All Shine: How Stewardship Built a Vision
Situational Leadership This philosophy of leadership was developed by Paul Hersey, (who wrote a book called Situational Leader), and Ken Blanchard, the author of The One Minute Manager. Simply stated, situational leadership theory proposes that no one leadership framework can work all the time in all contexts. The idea is very simple. Use whatever strategy is needed in the moment. Use whatever leadership style that is needed in a particular time frame or place.
This makes good sense to me, and it’s almost self-evident. All of the above modes of leadership have their uses, after all, depending on the variables within and surrounding an organization or project.
But, there’s a vital question in all of this. For situational leadership to be truly effective, one has to have arrived at a fulcrum of personal development, in which he or she possesses the awareness, skills and insights that can best facilitate the appropriate use of various leadership strategies.
One can take the position that personal growth, awareness and maturity don’t matter, and that leaders only need to be trained in “leadership strategies” to be successful. But, this position is very hard to defend and begs the following questions:
1. Can an internal rolodex of strategies be built up over time and expertly executed by a leader regardless of the maturity and intentions of the leader?
2. Can effective leadership be ensured by generating a list of strategies that can be studied, internalized, and accessed when the need arises in a given situation?
3. If leadership can be reduced to the acquisition of strategems, are some of the tactics and strategies on the list qualitative, involving the personal development of the leader?
The situational leadership model promotes the value of utilizing all modes, styles and frameworks of leadership, but doesn’t offer a satisfying explanation around the personal qualities that need to be developed and available for a leader to make effective use of them all.
Thus, we return once again to the personal character, worldview and development of the leader himself.